The headline is correct; the court held unanimously that a straight woman who claimed she was discriminated against by her ...

Johnson v. NCAA could be a clarifying win for the organization on employment, or it could be the case that hastens dramatic ...

A former Marion police employee sued, alleging she'd been sexually harassed and subject to retaliation. The Iowa Supreme ...

In a 5-2 decision, the majority affirmed a Jackson County Circuit Court Judge's decision to nullify a jury's $4 million award ...

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson — arguably the Supreme Court’s most progressive member — emphasized that the text of the law ...

The Bombay High Court has scheduled July 18 to begin fresh hearings on challenges to Maharashtra's Maratha reservation law, ...

The justices stated that under federal law, there is no distinction between “discrimination” and “reverse discrimination.” It’s all illegal and subject to the same standards.

The justices’ decision affects lawsuits in 20 states and the District of Columbia where, until now, courts had set a higher ...

Concern for employees led to the safeguarding of their rights in the event of a transfer of an undertaking, establishment or ...

The Supreme Court unanimously ruled that protection from sex discrimination applies equally to majority groups as well as ...

White individuals and straight people do not need to meet a higher burden of proof than members of minority groups to prevail in employment discrimination suits, the Supreme Court held June 5. The ...